Thursday, June 10, 2010

Last time with the 70% Rule - Promise!


At the risk of beating this to death, allow me to crow momentarily over the success of my 70% Rule - a simple formula for what it takes to win on the PGA Tour (originally explained here). Since the beginning of tournament golf and "stats" the experts have been searching for basic summary answers for how to describe performance that matters the most - that which wins tournaments. The old standards have been displayed and discussed FOREVER:  Fairways Hit, GIR's and Putts/GIR.  While their shortcomings are many, GIR's totally trumps Fairways Hit, and Putts/GIR leaves out all the holes where there was no GIR - consider only the Winners and this ignores a third of the holes played.  No wonder they did not work.

Over the past two months I have demonstrated that my 70% Rule, when applied to the three summary stats above, clearly works.  It is not perfect because nothing simple, or summary in nature,  could ever accurately describe the complex, multi-dimensional game of golf.  That said, it is the best I have seen.  For the last time, here it is:

The 70% Rule
The overall average of the stats listed in the graphic above should be 70%.  I give each of the three equal weight despite the fact that they do not represent equally weighted parts of the game.  To the extent that one falls below the 70% mark, the other two need to exceed the 70% mark by enough to offset the deficit.

At the same time, ERRORS must be kept to three or less in a four round event.  The Errors tend to be mistakes that result in a stroke lost:

Long Game Errors:  Balls hit out of play (requiring unusual advancements to return to play), or  any penalty situation.

Short Game Errors:  Shots that miss the green AND where the total strokes needed to hole out from the original short game shot exceed three.  The "exceed 3" is a slight modification from my earlier definition.  Why? Because further study revealed that to penalize a player for simply missing the green, if they ultimately get down in three strokes is double jeopardy - the Scrambling stat already covers it by capturing it as a failed save.  An error needs to be a shot that results in a stroke lost NOT the failure to save.

Putting Errors
3 Putts or worse from 40 feet and closer. 

Unfortunately, the PGA Tour does not provide us with the ability to gauge the errors mentioned - or any errors, for that matter.  I believe that at some point they will recognize the importance of the downside of the game as every other sport has.  Imagine the analysis of baseball without  Fielding Errors and Strike Outs or football without Fumbles and Interceptions.  Mistakes have long been recognized as the difference in the outcome of the game as are the errors in golf.  For more on the importance of avoiding Errors in your game, see my article in the July 2010 issue of Golf Digest (p. 101) REDUCE ERRORS.  The article allows readers to measure the impact of their mistakes on their handicaps.

On that note, both Justin Rose and Tiger had two errors - both in the long game.  

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Junior Golf is Alive and Well in Canada!

With my sincere apologies to Mike Bender, I regret that I saw nothing of Zach Johnson's victory at Colonial last weekend and even worse, did not collect his rounds for analysis and to add to my Winner's Profile - Sorry Mike!  I was not simply goofing off, I was north of the border at the Canadian National Junior Championships  - and not just a spectator.  My good friends at the RCGA paid me the great compliment of asking me to provide the performance statistic for the field of 99 players.  33 girls and 66 boys, between the ages of 14 and 18 - the best juniors from all over Canada.

The project was an extremely ambitious one and the idea of Doug Roxburgh, the Director of High Performance for the RCGA.  Incidently, who better to put in charge of fostering high performance than a proven, world class high performer.  Doug won't talk about it but I googled him to learn that he has only captured 4 Canadian Amateur, and 13 BC Amateur titles - and I was bragging about my member-guest...opps!

Doug's goal is to use the data collected for the field to set a benchmark for exactly where the best players are currently and let the analysis guide the RCGA's improvement initiatives over time.  While Doug and I were coaching players through the data entry process, Henry Brunton (Men's National Team Coach) was testing each player's club and ball speed, spin rates and attack and launch angles on TrackMan.  The combination of the on-course performance data and the sophisticated TrackMan data should set a new standard in performance analysis and I hope to team with Doug and Henry to publish our findings fairly soon - stay tuned.

It was an intense but exhilarating four days!  The players were polite and enthusiastic and seemed to really enjoy ShotByShot.  It warmed my heart to hear their good-natured banter:  "Dude, what is your Putting handicap?  Mine is a...."  The experience made the part of my heart that is "Canadian" grow 4 sizes larger.