Steve Marino is one of the recognizable newcomers on the PGA Golf Tour but has yet to win. He has made almost $5 million dollars in three years and has gotten very close to victory with two 2nd's and 14 Top-10's. Marino tied for 10th at the Wyndham Championship last weekend and was only three strokes behind the leaders and a play-off. Wouldn't Steve Marino - and the rest of us - like to know where his golf game fell short? Unfortunately his "Key Stats" on the Tour's website were typically vague (see above). To help with the analysis I ran his data through the ShotByShot.com models to see exactly where and why he missed out on his first victory.
Long Game Efficiency:
Steve's long game compared very favorably to the three players that tied for the lead and to our 2009 Winner's Profile ("Winners").
Greens-Hit-in-Regulation: 14 vs 13.75 Winners
Long Game Efficiency Index*: 2.35 vs 2.32 Winners
ShotByShot.com Long Game Handciap: +7 vs. +7 Winners
Short Game:
Marino's average short game shots finished within 5 feet of the hole, and he saved 75%. This compares favorably to the Winners database (5.3 feet and 69% saved).Steve's long game compared very favorably to the three players that tied for the lead and to our 2009 Winner's Profile ("Winners").
Greens-Hit-in-Regulation: 14 vs 13.75 Winners
Long Game Efficiency Index*: 2.35 vs 2.32 Winners
ShotByShot.com Long Game Handciap: +7 vs. +7 Winners
*This is our patented method of measuring the overall efficiency of a player's long game. For a better explanation, log onto http://www.shotbyshot.com/.
Short Game:
Sand Game:
Putting:
This is where Marino fell short, and the deficiency was especially glaring when I processed his putting data by distance:
ShotByShot.com Putting Handicap: +1 vs. +4 Winners
For putts in the 6 to 10 foot range, Marino made only 2 of 13 (15%) vs. 62% Winners. The three players that tied for the lead at the Wyndham made 65% of their putts in this critical range. (Ironically, the winner - Ryan Moore - was the worst with 8 of 14, or 57%.) Had Steve Marino made just 6 of his 13 opportunities (46%), he would have still been just below the average of the PGA Tour in the 6 to 10 foot range (50%), but he would have secured his 1st victory by 1 shot!
Does "Drive for show, Putt for dough" still hold, if you make $5 million and are a crappy putter?
ReplyDelete